Skip to content
P&L & unit economics

Free pour vs. jigger

By · Updated · Sources and editorial policy

Free pouring is measuring spirits by count and eye; jiggering uses a measure. Free pouring is faster, but its accuracy varies from bartender to bartender, and any overpour lands directly on pour cost — so test your own pours before choosing.

Worked example · A hypothetical 15% overpour at volume

Nominal pour
2.0 oz
Actual average pour
2.3 oz
Spirit cost
$1.10/oz
Drinks per week
900
Annual cost of the drift
$15,444

0.3 oz × $1.10 × 900 drinks × 52 weeks. The overpour here is an assumption; measure yours before costing it. It will never appear on an invoice.

The middle options

  • Measured pourers — speed close to free pour, consistency close to jiggering.
  • Jigger the expensive bottles. Free pour the well, measure anything above a cost threshold you set from your own bottle prices.
  • Batch the cocktails. Pre-batching the spirit portion of high-volume cocktails removes the variance entirely and speeds up service.
  • Test, then decide. Have each bartender free-pour into a jigger ten times and record the average and the spread before choosing a method.

Run the numbers

Pour cost calculator

Open it free →

The guide that works it through

How to Calculate Pour Cost for Liquor, Beer and Wine: Bottle, Keg and Glass Math

Cost a spirit pour, a cocktail, a draft pint and a glass of wine from bottle and keg sizes, then measure actual pour cost from inventory and find where the gap comes from.

Related terms

← All 63 terms