Cooking Yield: How to Measure Cooking Loss and Cost the Cooked Portion
By Marji · Published · Updated · 10 min read
Cooking yield is cooked weight divided by raw weight, times 100. To cost a cooked portion, divide the raw cost per pound by the yield, then multiply by the portion weight. At a 69% yield, brisket bought at $7.00 per raw pound costs $10.14 per cooked pound. Measure your own: USDA's tests of the same cut vary widely.
A recipe that lists a cooked portion — five ounces of brisket, an ounce and a half of bacon, four ounces of pulled pork — needs more raw product than the portion weighs. Costing that portion at the raw price per pound understates it by exactly the weight lost in the pan, the oven or the braise. The fix is one measurement and one division, taken at the same stage the kitchen portions from.
The three formulas
Cooking yield
Cooked weight ÷ raw weight × 100
Weigh the raw item at the stage the recipe starts from: after thawing and trimming if those come first. Write down the cooked stage too — hot after resting, chilled, sliced or pulled — because each gives a different number.
Cost per cooked pound
Raw cost per pound ÷ (cooking yield % ÷ 100)
Brisket at $7.00 per raw pound with a 69% yield: $7.00 ÷ 0.69 = $10.14 per cooked pound.
Raw weight for a cooked portion
Cooked portion weight ÷ (cooking yield % ÷ 100)
A 5 oz cooked portion at 69% needs 5 ÷ 0.69 = 7.25 oz of raw brisket. Cost either the 7.25 raw ounces at the raw price or the 5 cooked ounces at the cooked price — never the 5 ounces at the raw price, and never both adjustments at once.
USDA's Agricultural Research Service defines cooking yield the same way in its Table of Cooking Yields for Meat and Poultry: the hot cooked weight, recorded after a brief rest, divided by the raw weight. The formula uses the weight of the whole cooked sample; USDA records the edible portion separately for its nutrient calculations. For a bone-in or skin-on item measured this way, the published cooking yield still includes bone or skin you may not serve.
Worked example: a braised brisket portion
Worked example · Braised brisket flat, 5 oz cooked portion
- Raw cost, trimmed flat (hypothetical invoice)
- $7.00/lb
- Cooking yield (USDA mean, braised)
- 69%
- Cost per cooked pound
- $7.00 ÷ 0.69 = $10.14
- Raw brisket per portion
- 5 oz ÷ 0.69 = 7.25 oz
- Portion priced at the raw rate (wrong)
- $2.19
- Cost of the 5 oz cooked portion
- $3.17
The raw-rate shortcut understates this line by $0.98, or 31% of its actual cost. The price is hypothetical; the yield is USDA's mean for a braised brisket flat half trimmed to 1/8-inch fat.
USDA measured that brisket 20 times, and the individual yields ran from 65% to 76%. At the same $7.00 raw price, that range alone moves the portion from $2.88 to $3.37 — a 49-cent spread before anyone changes the supplier, the price or the portion. A table value is a sensible first estimate. The yield you cost with should come from your cut, your braise and your holding time.
USDA-published cooking yields for common restaurant cuts
| Item as described by USDA | Method | Mean yield | Samples | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beef brisket, flat half, 1/8-inch fat | Braised | 69% | 20 | 65–76% |
| Beef chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless | Braised | 64% | 33 | 60.9–78.2% |
| Beef chuck short ribs, boneless | Braised | 66.1% | 30 | 44.9–97.3% |
| Beef rib eye steak, boneless, lip-on, 1/8-inch fat | Grilled | 83.6% | 36 | 74.6–91.9% |
| Beef top sirloin steak, 1/8-inch fat | Broiled or grilled | 80% | 20 | 69–87% |
| Beef outside skirt steak | Grilled | 68.2% | 72 | 58.6–79.3% |
| Ground beef patty, 12–22% fat | Pan-broiled | 73% | 4 | 70.8–76.0% |
| Ground beef patty, 12–22% fat | Broiled or grilled | 69% | 4 | 64.0–72.4% |
| Pork spareribs | Baked or roasted | 76% | 12 | 68–79% |
| Pork shoulder, arm picnic | Braised | 74% | 12 | 70–78% |
| Bacon, cured | Baked or roasted | 32% | 3 | 30.5–32.6% |
| Chicken breast, meat and skin (1975 data) | Baked or roasted | 72% | — | 61–82% |
| Chicken thigh, meat and skin (1975 data) | Baked or roasted | 69% | — | 58–79% |
| Turkey, whole, not enhanced, meat and skin | Roasted | 71% | 1 | — |
The full table has 173 rows; the dataset is published by USDA with sample counts, standard deviations and moisture and fat changes. Three limits apply before you borrow a number from it. The studies followed fixed protocols — the ground beef patties, for example, were cooked to 160°F with no added fat — so a different method, end temperature or rest gives a different yield. Several rows rest on one to four samples, and the two chicken rows above come from a 1975 USDA handbook with no sample count. And the yield is a hot weight after a brief rest: a roast that is chilled, sliced and reheated for service is portioned at a different stage, so its usable yield has to be measured at that stage. For fruits and vegetables, the produce yield chart lists USDA's as-purchased to ready-to-use yields.
How to run a cooking yield test
- Pick one item and write down its exact specification: cut, grade, trim level, fresh or frozen, and whether it is enhanced (injected with a solution). Record the supplier, invoice date and price per pound.
- Weigh it raw at the stage the recipe starts from. If you trim first, weigh after trimming and record the trim separately. If it arrives frozen, weigh after thawing and draining.
- Cook it the way service does: same equipment, temperature, time, end-point temperature and rest. A test cooked more carefully than a busy Friday measures the test, not the kitchen.
- Weigh at the stage you portion from — hot after resting, chilled before slicing, or after slicing or pulling. Remove bone, skin, fat cap and unservable end pieces first if they never reach the plate.
- Divide the servable weight by the raw weight. Record the stage, the date and who ran the test.
- Repeat on separate deliveries and use the average, keeping the lowest and highest results beside it. One test is one observation, not a standard.
- Test again when the supplier, specification, cooking method or holding time changes.
When trimming and cooking both remove weight
Many items lose weight twice: first to trimming — fat cap, silverskin, bone — and then to heat. Multiply the two yields; do not add or subtract the percentages. An 81.25% trim yield followed by a 70% cooking yield leaves 0.8125 × 0.70 = 56.9% of the purchased weight as servable product.
| Stage | Weight or value | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Purchased at $3.00/lb | 16 lb, $48.00 | As-purchased cost |
| Usable trim for the house grind, credited at $2.50/lb | 2 lb, $5.00 | Credited only because it replaces ground pork you would buy |
| Waste: silverskin and glands | 1 lb | No credit |
| Trimmed weight | 13 lb | Trim yield 13 ÷ 16 = 81.25% |
| Roasted, rested and pulled | 9.1 lb | Cooking yield 9.1 ÷ 13 = 70% |
| Net cost after the trim credit | $43.00 | $48.00 − $5.00 |
| Cost per cooked pound | $4.73 | $43.00 ÷ 9.1 lb |
| 4 oz cooked portion | $1.18 | 4 ÷ 16 × $4.7253 |
Without the credit, the same test costs $5.27 per cooked pound and $1.32 per portion. The credit is honest only when the trim goes into something you sell and would otherwise buy; the butcher's test shows how to value it, and trim loss separates recoverable trim from waste. A credit for a stock you never make lowers the cost on paper and nowhere else.
Keep the portion cost current when the invoice changes
A yield test stays useful through many price changes, because the yield belongs to the product and the method, not to the price. Express it as a cost factor and each new invoice price converts straight to a cooked cost.
Cost factor
Cost per cooked pound ÷ purchase price per pound
With no by-product credit this is 1 ÷ yield: for the brisket, 1 ÷ 0.69 = 1.4493. When the invoice moves from $7.00 to $7.70 per pound, the cooked cost becomes $7.70 × 1.4493 = $11.16 per pound, and the 5 oz portion rises from $3.17 to $3.49.
The shortcut assumes every part of the calculation moves with the purchase price, and a fixed-dollar credit does not. In the pork example the factor is $4.7253 ÷ $3.00 = 1.5751. If the price rises to $3.30 while the trim is still credited at $2.50 per pound, the recomputed cost is $5.25 per cooked pound; the factor shortcut gives $5.20, about 1% low. Recompute the whole test when a credit matters, or update the credit's price at the same time.
In a costing tool that stores purchased quantities, record the raw quantity each portion needs — about 7.25 oz of raw brisket for a 5 oz cooked portion — against the ingredient's purchase price. Yield is already included in that raw quantity; do not apply the loss twice. In Marji, every extracted invoice line requires operator review before confirmation records a cost, regardless of OCR confidence. A confirmed price can then recost affected dishes; the recipe's quantities, units, yields and completeness remain your inputs to check.
Decisions a yield test changes
Which ground beef blend costs less per cooked pound
Leaner ground beef costs more per raw pound and loses less weight in cooking. USDA's “broiled or grilled” patties — oven-broiled to 160°F in its ground beef study — kept 63% of their raw weight above 22% fat, 69% at 12–22% and 73% below 12%. With these hypothetical prices, the cheapest raw blend is still the cheapest cooked blend, but by far less than the raw prices suggest.
| Blend | Raw price/lb | Broiled yield | Cooked cost/lb | Cooked oz from a 1/3 lb patty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 73/27 (over 22% fat) | $4.10 | 63% | $6.51 | 3.36 oz |
| 80/20 (12–22% fat) | $4.60 | 69% | $6.67 | 3.68 oz |
| 90/10 (under 12% fat) | $5.40 | 73% | $7.40 | 3.89 oz |
The break-even premium is the ratio of the yields. At these yields, 90/10 costs the same per cooked pound as 80/20 when its raw price is 5.8% higher (0.73 ÷ 0.69 = 1.058), which is $4.87 against $4.60. Pay less than that premium and the leaner blend is cheaper to serve; pay more and it is not. Taste, juiciness and the patty the guest sees are separate decisions, and with four samples per fat level, run the test on your own grill before switching. To turn the patty cost into a menu price, see how to price a burger.
How much raw product to order
Yield also sets the order. For 120 brisket portions at 5 oz cooked and a 69% yield, you need 120 × 5 ÷ 0.69 = 869.6 raw ounces, or 54.3 lb of trimmed flat, before any allowance for holding loss or a busy weekend. The par level calculator turns that usage into an order-up-to quantity.
Portions specified by cooked weight
Bacon shows the effect most clearly. USDA's oven-cooked bacon (its “baked or roasted” row) kept 32% of its raw weight across three samples. A club sandwich spec of 1.5 oz cooked bacon needs 1.5 ÷ 0.32 = 4.69 oz raw; at a hypothetical $5.80 per raw pound that is $1.70 per sandwich, not the $0.54 you get by pricing 1.5 oz at the raw rate. If your spec counts raw slices instead, cost the raw weight and skip the yield.
Mistakes that distort the result
- Applying yield twice. If the recipe already lists the raw quantity, cost it at the raw price. Dividing by the yield again overstates the dish.
- Using a table value as your yield. Published yields come from set protocols and sometimes small samples. Use them to sanity-check your test, not to replace it.
- Mixing stages. A hot-weight yield applied to a chilled, sliced product understates its cost. Record the stage with every yield.
- Forgetting what is not served. Bone, skin and fat cap weigh something in the pan and nothing on the plate.
- Comparing suppliers per raw pound. Two products at the same raw price can cost differently per cooked pound when their specification or added solution differs. Compare the usable cost instead.
- Testing once, forever. Retest after a change in supplier, specification, method or holding time.
What is a good cooking yield?
There is no single good number. It depends on the cut, fat level, method and the stage you weigh at: in USDA's table, oven-cooked bacon keeps about 32% of its raw weight while a grilled boneless rib eye keeps about 84%. The useful number is the one you measure for your own item and method.
Is cooking yield the same as yield percentage?
Cooking yield is one kind of yield percentage. Trim yield measures what preparation removes; cooking yield measures what heat removes. Multiply them for the overall yield from purchase to plate.
Should I cost a recipe by raw or cooked weight?
Either works if you are consistent. List raw quantities and cost them at the raw price, or list cooked portions and cost them at the cooked price per pound. Mixing the two is where most yield errors start.
Does Marji apply cooking yields automatically?
No. The free recipe cost calculator takes a usable yield for each ingredient, and in a Marji account you record the quantity each portion uses; an accepted invoice price then recosts the dish. The yield itself is a measurement your kitchen supplies.
For a purchasing decision using the measured yield, compare whole and boneless chicken costs, including prep time and demand for the resulting cuts.
Turn your test into a portion cost
Enter the purchase price, the raw and cooked weights and your portion size. See the cost per cooked pound and per portion without an account.
Calculate yield and costTerms this guide uses
Yield percentage
Usable ingredient weight divided by starting weight, expressed as a percentage for a specified preparation step.
Trim loss
The weight removed during preparation — the difference between what you bought and what you can cook.
Edible portion vs. as-purchased
As purchased (AP) describes food in the form you buy it; edible portion (EP) describes the usable amount after a specified preparation step.
Read next
Recipe Costing, Step by Step: Purchase Unit to Served Portion
Cost a recipe from supplier pack to served portion, with source dates, measured yields, a worked plate and explicit handling of missing ingredient costs.
How to Compare Restaurant Supplier Prices When Case Sizes Differ
Compare supplier quotes by purchased and usable units, including pack sizes, yields and known fees. Follow a worked case-to-portion example.
Restaurant Invoice Price Audit: Check the Line Before Updating Recipe Costs
Check supplier invoice prices, smaller packs, catch weights and credits before updating recipe costs. Worked examples show what changes and what stays unresolved.